1992 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (57 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 1983 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1992 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |