1992 Ford Ranger vs. 1988 Mitsubishi Debonair
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Mitsubishi Debonair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Mitsubishi Debonair would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Mitsubishi Debonair (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Mitsubishi Debonair should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Mitsubishi Debonair. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1988 Mitsubishi Debonair has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 Mitsubishi Debonair will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 1988 Mitsubishi Debonair | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Debonair |
Year Released | 1992 | 1988 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |