1992 Ford Ranger vs. 1995 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1995 Mercury Cougar is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 1995 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Ranger | Cougar |
Year Released | 1992 | 1995 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |