1992 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 1996 Renault Megane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Megane (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 1996 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | Megane |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |