1992 Ford Ranger vs. 1998 Rover 400
To start off, 1998 Rover 400 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1998 Rover 400. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 400.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Ranger | 1998 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Ranger | 400 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
