1992 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Honda Civic
To start off, 2000 Honda Civic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Honda Civic. (104 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Civic.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda Civic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Honda Civic has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda Civic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Ranger | 2000 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Ranger | Civic |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
