1992 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2002 Skoda Octavia is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2002 Skoda Octavia. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Skoda Octavia.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Skoda Octavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 2002 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Ranger | Octavia |
Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |