1992 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Morgan 4
To start off, 2003 Morgan 4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Morgan 4 (112 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Morgan 4 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Ranger | 2003 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Morgan |
| Model | Ranger | 4 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
