1992 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ranger | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |