1992 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,437 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (574 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 465 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ranger | CLK |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 5437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 574 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |