1992 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 2005 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Carisma |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1832 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |