1992 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2005 Subaru Outback is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Subaru Outback (250 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Ranger | 2005 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Ranger | Outback |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2298 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
