1992 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Sedona (245 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Kia Sedona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 2006 Kia Sedona | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Ranger | Sedona |
Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 3786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |