1992 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Renault Duster
To start off, 2010 Renault Duster is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Renault Duster. (104 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Duster.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 2010 Renault Duster | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | Duster |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4315 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1822 mm |