1992 Ford Ranger vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2011 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2011 Volvo C30.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Ranger | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | C30 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1783 mm |