1992 Ford Taurus vs. 1965 Renault 8
To start off, 1992 Ford Taurus is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8.
Because 1965 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 1965 Renault 8 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taurus | 8 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2280 mm |