1992 Ford Taurus vs. 1972 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1992 Ford Taurus is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1972 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Because 1972 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Belmont. (229 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 1972 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Taurus | Belmont |
Year Released | 1992 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 229 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |