1992 Ford Taurus vs. 1976 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1992 Ford Taurus is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 2101.
Because 1976 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 1976 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Taurus | 2101 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2430 mm |