1992 Ford Taurus vs. 1977 Mazda 323
To start off, 1992 Ford Taurus is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1977 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1977 Mazda 323 has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Taurus has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Taurus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Mazda 323 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 1977 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | 323 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1414 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2320 mm |