1992 Ford Taurus vs. 1981 Seat 131
To start off, 1992 Ford Taurus is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat 131 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1981 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 131.
Because 1981 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 1981 Seat 131 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Taurus | 131 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2500 mm |