1992 Ford Taurus vs. 1984 Zastava 750
To start off, 1992 Ford Taurus is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1984 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1984 Zastava 750.
Because 1984 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 1984 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Taurus | 750 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1984 |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2010 mm |