1992 Ford Taurus vs. 1996 Mazda 121
To start off, 1996 Mazda 121 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 121.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 121. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 1996 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | 121 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |