1992 Ford Taurus vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1992 Ford Taurus. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Taurus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Taurus. (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Taurus | C2 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 284 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2240 mm |