1992 Ford Taurus vs. 1999 Honda HR-V
To start off, 1999 Honda HR-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1999 Honda HR-V. (104 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda HR-V.
Because 1999 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Honda HR-V. (136 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Taurus | 1999 Honda HR-V | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Taurus | HR-V |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1668 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 90 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2360 mm |
