1992 Ford Taurus vs. 2005 Mazda Carol
To start off, 2005 Mazda Carol is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Carol. (45 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Carol.
Because 2005 Mazda Carol is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Carol will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Carol. (58 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Carol.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Taurus | 2005 Mazda Carol | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Taurus | Carol |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 58 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2370 mm |
