1992 Ford Taurus vs. 2005 Mazda Drifter
To start off, 2005 Mazda Drifter is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Drifter. (112 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Drifter.
Because 2005 Mazda Drifter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda Drifter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Drifter. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Drifter.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 2005 Mazda Drifter | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | Drifter |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 21.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |