1992 Ford Taurus vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1992 Ford Taurus. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Taurus.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (381 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Taurus. (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Taurus. 2005 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Taurus has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Taurus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Taurus | XC90 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2720 mm |