1992 Ford Taurus vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1992 Ford Taurus. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Taurus.
Because 2009 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Taurus. (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Taurus. 2009 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Taurus has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Taurus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Taurus | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Ford | Saturn |
| Model | Taurus | Outlook |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3030 mm |
