1992 Ford Taurus vs. 2010 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Stilo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Stilo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (256 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Taurus | 2010 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | Ford | Fiat |
| Model | Taurus | Stilo |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 256 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 90.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
