1992 Ford Taurus vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Taurus. (271 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Taurus. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Taurus has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Taurus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Taurus | Epica |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |