1992 Ford Taurus vs. 2010 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2010 Renault Scenic is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2010 Renault Scenic. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Scenic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Scenic. (191 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 2010 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taurus | Scenic |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2690 mm |