1992 Ford Taurus vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1992 Ford Taurus. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Taurus.
Because 2011 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda RX-8. (215 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 2011 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2703 mm |