1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1942 Simca 5
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Simca 5 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1942 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1942 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 605 kg more than 1942 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 1942 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Tempo | 5 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2010 mm |
