1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1951 Lancia Aurelia
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Lancia Aurelia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Lancia Aurelia would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1951 Lancia Aurelia. (75 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1951 Lancia Aurelia.
Because 1951 Lancia Aurelia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Lancia Aurelia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 1951 Lancia Aurelia | |
| Make | Ford | Lancia |
| Model | Tempo | Aurelia |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2660 mm |
