1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1955 Renault Juva
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 420 kg more than 1955 Renault Juva.
Because 1955 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 1955 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Tempo | Juva |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2360 mm |
