1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1955 Renault Juva
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 450 kg more than 1955 Renault Juva.
Because 1955 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 1955 Renault Juva | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Tempo | Juva |
Year Released | 1992 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2360 mm |