1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1956 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1956 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1956 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 1956 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Tempo | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3153 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 1350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2060 mm |