1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1960 Land Rover 88
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Land Rover 88. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Land Rover 88 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (97 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1960 Land Rover 88. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1960 Land Rover 88. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Land Rover 88 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 1960 Land Rover 88 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Land Rover 88 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Land Rover 88. (157 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Land Rover 88.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 1960 Land Rover 88 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Tempo | 88 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 171 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2240 mm |