1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1962 Opel Kapitan
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Opel Kapitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Opel Kapitan would be higher. At 2,605 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Opel Kapitan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Opel Kapitan weights approximately 93 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 1962 Opel Kapitan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Opel Kapitan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 1962 Opel Kapitan | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Tempo | Kapitan |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1258 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2550 mm |
