1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 455 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Tempo | 8 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2280 mm |
