1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1963 Wartburg 311
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 311. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 311. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 205 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 311. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 311. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 311.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 1963 Wartburg 311 | |
Make | Ford | Wartburg |
Model | Tempo | 311 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 70.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2460 mm |