1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Tempo | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
