1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 493 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Tempo | Elan |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 702 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1170 mm |
