1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1968 Oldsmobile 442
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Oldsmobile 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Oldsmobile 442 would be higher. At 7,464 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Oldsmobile 442 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Oldsmobile 442. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 1968 Oldsmobile 442 | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Tempo | 442 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 7464 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1685 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2850 mm |
