1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1971 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 1971 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1971 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1971 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 1971 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Tempo | Corniche |
Year Released | 1992 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3030 mm |