1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 131 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Tempo | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2680 mm |
