1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 198 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (204 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Tempo | Elan |
Year Released | 1992 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 204 Nm | 143 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 997 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2260 mm |