1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 400 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Tempo | 400 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2560 mm |