1992 Ford Tempo vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 1998 Kia Elan | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Tempo | Elan |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 151 HP |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2270 mm |
