1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2000 Panoz AIV

To start off, 2000 Panoz AIV is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Panoz AIV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Panoz AIV (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Panoz AIV should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 15 kg more than 2000 Panoz AIV.

Because 2000 Panoz AIV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Panoz AIV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Panoz AIV (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (204 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2000 Panoz AIV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.

Compare all specifications: